BlockAway vs KProxy covers two of the most established free proxy services available in 2026. KProxy has been running since 2005 — one of the longest-operating proxy services on the internet — while BlockAway has grown rapidly to over 9 million monthly visits by focusing on a clean, modern interface and expanding server options. Both are free, browser-based, and require no registration. However, they differ in meaningful ways that affect which is the better choice depending on how you use it.
About KProxy
KProxy launched in 2005 and has maintained continuous operation for over 19 years — an unusually long lifespan in the proxy service industry where many competitors have disappeared. It operates both a web-based proxy at kproxy.com and browser extensions for Chrome and Firefox, which distinguishes it from most web-only proxy services. KProxy’s free tier includes access to multiple server locations with a bandwidth cap, while its premium version removes limits.
KProxy’s longevity means it has a well-established reputation and a larger backlink profile — it appears in more discussions, comparisons, and resource lists than newer services. This also means its server IPs are more widely known and appear on more network blocklists, which can reduce effectiveness on networks with aggressive content filtering.
Full Feature Comparison
| Feature | BlockAway | KProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier availability | Yes | Yes (bandwidth capped) |
| Registration required | No | No |
| SSL encryption | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | Yes (Chrome + Firefox) |
| Server locations (free) | Multiple | Multiple (2 on free) |
| Premium tier | $3.50/mo — named locations | Yes — removes bandwidth cap |
| Free bandwidth cap | None stated | Yes — explicit limit |
| Interface modernity | Clean, modern | Functional, dated |
| Years in operation | Since ~2019 | Since 2005 |
| Monthly traffic | ~9M visits | Lower, declining |
| Mobile browser support | Yes | Yes |
| No-logs policy | Claimed | Claimed |
| Video streaming support | Basic | Basic |
KProxy’s Key Advantage: Browser Extension
KProxy’s Chrome and Firefox extensions are its strongest distinguishing feature. The extension integrates proxy switching directly into the browser toolbar — you toggle the proxy on or off with a single click rather than navigating to a proxy website each time. Furthermore, when the extension is active, all traffic in that browser routes through the proxy automatically rather than requiring you to enter each URL manually into a proxy interface.
This makes KProxy significantly more convenient for users who need to toggle proxy access on and off throughout their day — for example, a worker who needs proxy access for specific sites but wants direct connection for everything else. BlockAway requires manually entering each URL, which is fine for occasional use but becomes tedious for frequent switching.
BlockAway’s Key Advantages Over KProxy
BlockAway’s free tier has no stated bandwidth cap, whereas KProxy’s free tier limits data usage explicitly. For users who need to browse through a proxy for extended sessions without hitting limits, BlockAway is more practical for free-tier use.
Additionally, BlockAway’s premium tier ($3.50/month) offers specifically named server locations including Germany, UK, Spain, Canada, and Israel — useful for accessing geo-restricted content from particular countries. KProxy’s premium tier primarily removes the bandwidth cap rather than providing named country servers. Consequently, for users who need to appear to browse from a specific country, BlockAway’s premium offers clearer value.
BlockAway’s newer infrastructure also means its server IPs appear on fewer corporate and institutional blocklists than KProxy’s well-known, long-running server range. On networks that specifically block known proxy services, BlockAway may succeed where KProxy fails.
Which to Choose for Your Use Case
| Use Case | Better Choice | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Frequent proxy toggling throughout the day | KProxy | Browser extension makes switching instant |
| Occasional URL-by-URL access | Either | Both handle this equally well |
| Extended sessions without data limits | BlockAway | No bandwidth cap on free tier |
| Specific country server access | BlockAway Premium | Named server locations on premium |
| Networks where old proxies are blocked | BlockAway | Newer server IPs less likely on blocklists |
| Long-term established service preference | KProxy | 19 years operation, strong track record |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KProxy still working in 2026?
Yes. KProxy continues to operate in 2026. Its longevity is remarkable in a market where proxy services frequently disappear. However, its traffic has declined as newer services like BlockAway and Proxyium have captured users with cleaner interfaces. The core service remains functional.
Does KProxy have a mobile app?
No. KProxy does not offer a dedicated mobile app. It works in mobile browsers through kproxy.com, and the Chrome extension is compatible with Chrome on Android. For mobile proxy access, BlockAway’s mobile-responsive web interface and the option to use Chrome extension on Android provide comparable functionality.
Can I use KProxy and BlockAway together?
Yes, and many experienced proxy users maintain accounts or bookmarks for multiple services. When one proxy’s servers are blocked on a specific network, another may not be. Using KProxy’s extension for general proxy browsing and keeping BlockAway bookmarked as a backup when KProxy’s servers are blocked is a practical approach.
Which is safer — BlockAway or KProxy?
Both claim no-logs policies without independent audits. KProxy’s longer operating history gives it a track record — it has not been involved in any known user data exposure incident. Neither service should be used for sensitive tasks involving personal credentials or financial information regardless of which you choose. For verified privacy, a paid VPN with an audited no-logs policy provides meaningfully stronger protection than either free proxy.
